Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/1962
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdeyeye, A. D.-
dc.contributor.authorOyawale, F. A.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-11T09:24:23Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-11T09:24:23Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn0035-9645-
dc.identifier.otherRMZ - Materials and Geoenvironment 57(2), pp. 251-270-
dc.identifier.otherui_art_adeyeye_multi-objective_2010-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/1962-
dc.description.abstractThe traditional welding flux development is by lengthy and costly trial and error experiments and the optimum welding flux formulation is not guaranteed. This paper presents discussions on promising multi-objective decision making (MODM) methods that can mitigate the limitations of the traditional approach to welding flux design. The methods are weighted-sum scalarization (WSS), desirability indices, goal programming and compromise programming. The steps a welding flux designer (WFD) may follow to determine the best compromise welding flux, welding flux design situations where each may be useful and tradeoff explorations were mentioned. No attempt was made to determine the relative merits of the approaches because the usefulness of each depends on the welding flux design situation. The descriptions only serve as a guide for the WFD to decide which method best suits his needs.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFaculty of Natural Science and Engineering, Ljubljana, Velenje Coal Mine and Institute for Mining, Geotechnology and Environment (IRGO), Ljubljanaen_US
dc.titleMulti-objective methods for welding flux performance optimizationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:scholarly works

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
(5)ui_art_adeyeye_multi-objective_2010.pdf.pdf1.24 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in UISpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.