Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/3495
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAina, K.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-23T14:54:11Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-23T14:54:11Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn1115-1277-
dc.identifier.otherThe Justice Journal 6, pp. 147-172-
dc.identifier.otherui_art_aina_current_2014-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/3495-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the process laid down by the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2004for bringing a Derivative Action by minority shareholders in Nigeria. The basis for the action is the exceptions to the rule in Foss v Harbottle and the need to ensure that fraudsters who are in control of the company’s machinery for filing action in the name of the company do not use the opportunity to enrich themselves to the detriment of the company. The procedure laid down in the CAMA as well as the restrictive interpretation of the law by the Supreme Court in Nigeria is analysed and the way forward suggested.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFederal Ministry of Justiceen_US
dc.titleCurrent developments in derivative actions under the Nigerian company lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:scholarly works

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
(20)ui_art_aina_current_2014.pdf3.98 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in UISpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.