Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/4099
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOladokun, A.-
dc.contributor.authorAdesina, O. A.-
dc.contributor.authorOdukogbe, A. A.-
dc.contributor.authorMorhason-Bello, I. O.-
dc.contributor.authorAdewole, I. F.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-29T10:43:20Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-29T10:43:20Z-
dc.date.issued2007-02-
dc.identifier.issn1597-7188-
dc.identifier.otherIbom Medical Journal 2(1), pp. 28-30-
dc.identifier.otherui_art_oladokun_comparative_2007-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/4099-
dc.description.abstractIncompetence of the internal uterine cervical os is associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Different surgical techniques are in practice to correct the defect. The objective of this study therefore was to review the outcome of pregnancies following cervical using either of the two procedure among patients diagnosed as having incompetence of the cervix. A comparative study of 2 standard methods of cerclage used in our hospital, McDonald & Shirodkar, in a group of 80 patients was done. All the patients had cervical cerclage insertion done between the 14 & 16 weeks of gestation using either of the two methods. There was no significant morbidity with either of the 2 methods. The overall success rates, as measured by continuation of the pregnancy to term, were similar. Both methods of cervical cerclage are equally effective in producing the desired outcome, but since the McDonald method is technically simpler to perform, it may be desirable to adopt this approach more frequently.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNigerian Medical Association, Akwa Ibom State Branchen_US
dc.subjectRecurrent Mid-trimester Lossen_US
dc.subjectCerclageen_US
dc.subjectCervical Incompetenceen_US
dc.titleA comparative study of two surgical management methods for cervical incompetence at the University College Hospital, Ibadanen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:scholarly works

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
(18) ui_art_oladokun_comparative_2007.pdf419.03 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in UISpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.