Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/7353
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBamigbola, A. A.-
dc.contributor.authorAdetimirin, A. E.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-02T10:26:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-02T10:26:18Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn1057-2317-
dc.identifier.issn1095-9297-
dc.identifier.otherui_art_bamigbola_assessing_2020-
dc.identifier.otherInternational Information & Library Review 52(2), pp. 95-107-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.library.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/7353-
dc.description.abstractInstitutional repositories (IRs) present platform to disseminate research findings to complement the traditional scholarly communication model. The use of IRs is beneficial to authors, host institutions, libraries and society at large. Despite the numerous benefits of IRs, there is low deposit of scholarly works by lecturers and the investment on IRs seems to be a waste. This study examined determinants of perceived ease of use (PEOU) of IRs by lecturers in Nigerian universities. A survey of lecturers received 857 respondents. Awareness, anchor and adjustment factors were found to be determinants of PEOU of Institutional repositories by lecturers in Nigerian Universitiesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Taylor and Francis Groupen_US
dc.subjectAdjustment factorsen_US
dc.subjectAnchor factorsen_US
dc.subjectAwarenessen_US
dc.subjectInstitutional repositoriesen_US
dc.subjectLecturersen_US
dc.subjectNigerian universitiesen_US
dc.subjectPerceived ease of useen_US
dc.titleAssessing determinants of perceived ease of use of institutional repositories by lecturers in Nigerian universitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Scholarly works

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
(11) ui_art_bamigbola_assessing_2020.pdf1.64 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in UISpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.