CAPACITY BUILDING AND JOB PRODUCTIVITY OF LIBRARY STAFF IN SELECTED UNIVERSITIES IN SOUTH-W EST NIGERIA % Olalekan A. ADEKUNJO, CLN Kenneth Dike Library, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, +234 8054063921; blessing_adekunjo@yahoo.com Senior Librarian, Kenneth Dike Library, University of Ibadan, Ibadan Susanah O. TOMOMOWO-AYODELE, CLN +2348033825558; susanyinka@yahoo.com Senior Librarian, Kenneth Dike Library, University of Ibadan, Ibadan Tosin Folake BAMIDELE Department of Library, Archival and Information Science, University of Ibadan, Ibadan. Abstract: The paper examined the level o f capacity building to library staff in selected University Libraries; it identified the various forms of capacity building strategies put in place, and the extent to which capacity building affected-library job productivity. It also looked at the relationship between capacity building and job productivity in the selected universities in south-west o f Nigeria. Survey research* methodology was used with a total sample size of 202 library staff using the total enumeration sampling technique due to the small size o f the population. Data was collected mainly through Questionnaire and analyzed using frequency distribution and regression analysis run on SPSS (2.0.) The result revealed that the level o f capacity building for libranj staffwas basically moderate with (20.5366) as it focused principally on job rotation and computer-basedfor library staff. The level o f job productivity was high with (17.1905) therefore regular and targeted training programs should be organized periodically for library staff base on the identified-job requirements of each library staff which would lead to enhanced organizational productivity and s taffjob performance among other"factors were part o f the recommendations. Keywords: Capacity Building, Training, Job Productivity, library Staff University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and In form ation Science (UI-JLIS) Vol. 2 No. 1, March, 2019 Pgl UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY INTRODUCTION Libraries are institutions of learning that strive to meet the information and knowledge needs of users. Porumbeanuz (2012) stressed that "a library is an investment in humanity in its progress and its struggles and its traditions". University libraries are responsible for providing relevant, comprehensive, and up-to-date information to diversified users. They are crucial for the future of the parent institution and for the nation as well. It is therefore necessary for library staff in the uhiversity system to keep in touch with the changing trend in library and information services in order to enhance their productivity. In the present global economy, most employers have realized that for their organization to compete and be successful, the productivity of their employees is very important. For this reason, many employers of labour put several mechanisms in place to ensure that optimum job productivity is achieved. Job productivity, according to Munchinsky (2003) is the set of an employee's behavior that can be monitored, measured, and assessed at individual level. These behaviors are also in agreement with the organizational goals. Hence, Saetang, Sulumnad, Thampitak and Stingkaew (2010) believe that job productivity is a human behaviourwhich the result is an important factor for individual work effectiveness evaluation. Therefore, it is argued that optintum productivity within the library is related to achieving the quality, quantity, cooperation, dependability and creativity of the library staff. Moreover, the main objective of every organization is to improve its performance by increased productivity but it can never be possible without the efficient performance of employees. Job productivity needs to comply with knowledge acquisition, skills development and of course good personal values, which come as a reward of the employee having an annual salary increase and promotion (Igbaekemen, 2014). Capacity building is concerned with improving knowledge and improving skills in relation to a job or occupation. Therefore, training is key element of Improving employees performance which leads to increase in production i.e. employee productivity. According to Igbaekemen (2014) capacity building increases the level of individual and organizational competence. Capacity building for employees is essential if peqple are to continue to be efficient member of an organization. Capacity building, according to Cole (2002), is a learning activity which is directed towards the acquisition of specific knowledge and skills for the purpose of an occupation or task. University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JLJS) Vol. 2 No. 1, March, 2019 P g 2 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY Generally, human beings long to be motivated in other to perform; effectively. Thus,'the determinants of optimum job productivity are capacity building and motivation. It is therefore important that appropriate capacity building be given to library personnel in order to motivate them for efficiency and optimum productivity. These intellectual intangibles can be translated into an organizational resource through the people that acquire, infer and utilize such towards the achievement of the organization-wide capacity building. (Armstrong, 2006). Capacity buildings are planned learning experiences whiclrteach employees how to perform current and future jobs more effectively. Sims (2002) emphasizes that training focuses on present jobs while development prepares employees for possible future jobs. Basically, the objective of capacity building is to contribute to the organization's overall goal. Statement of the problem The library helps in providing and solving the inf ormation needs of different users: students, lecturers, and other researchers. This is done through the assistance of the library personnel at various levels. However, research, "and observation show that most times users complain that library staff does not attend to their query properly, whicft could be attributed to lack of adequate training which as a result, effects their job productivity. This study therefore, seeks to investigate the effect of capacity building on job productivity of library staff in selected universities in south-west Nigeria. Obviously, most of the existing scholarly worksorttraining,manpower development, capacity building and job performance concentrated on industrial settings to the neglect of services organizations typified in government ministries and parastatals as well as library settings. It is therefore the need to extend frontiers in knowledge on the aforementioned theme that this study focused'on capacity building and its impact on job productivity among library staff in selected universities iyt south west Nigeria. Research Questions 1. What is the level of capacity building accessible to library staff in selected universities in south west Nigeria? 2. What are the various forms of capacity building strategies accessible to library staff in selected universities in south west Nigeria? University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JLIS) Vol. 2 No. 1, March, 2019 Pg 3 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY 3. To what extent does capacity building affect job productivity of library staff in selected universities in Southwest Nigeria? 4. What is the perceived importance of capacity building on job performance among library staff in selected universities in south­ west Nigeria? LITERATURE REVIEW Concept of Job Productivity Performance is considered as behavior or a method which operates based on the organizations, groups and individuals. In other words, performance is behavior by determined indicators which can be evaluated positively or negatively for employees (Jans, et al.) In essence, performance can be regarded as almost any behavior directed toward a task or goal accomplishment. It may also involve the production of a certain number of goods or being seen as a satisfactorily performer by one one's boss. Organizational performance can be defined as when an organization meets its set targets putting into consideration all other variables, external and internal dimensions that influence performance (Kreitner&Kinicki, 2007). . - Viswesvaran (2000) introduced a more recent definition of job productivity as "scalable action", that is, behavior and outcomes that employees engage in or bring about that the linked with and contribute to organizational goals. Hakala (2008), on his part, gave the following performance indicators: effectiveness, efficiency, profits, value, innovation, creativity, work relationships, job skill, decision-making, communication etc. Shadare and Hammed (2009), while also commenting on job productivity, proposed the following parameters to measure, performance: quantity and quality, speed and accuracy, creativity and innovation,- risk taking and skills for future development etc. the central theme of-all the definitions revolves round behavior that are relevant and contribute to the realization of the organizational goals and objectives. The foundation of enhanced human resource productivity lies in development of their different abilities. Thus knowledge, skill and abilities are determ inants ofem ployees' perform ance w hich organizations need to continuously invest in wisely in order to improve their employees' productivity (Noe, 2006). To influence employees' job productivity and their willingness and ability to put in their best, employers need to/focus on two aspects of the work environment. First, University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JLIS) Vol. 2 No. 1, March, 2 019 Pg4 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY they can provide work enablement, that is, the support that employSbs need to dp ttieir work efficiently and effectively. Secondly, employers can also create a healthful work environment, that is, one that supports employees' physical, • social and emotional well-being, referred to as energy. Thu**'when an organization builds a workplace that actively marries high levels of employee engagement with enablement and energy; it opens the door wider to significant performance lift and enhanced job productivity (Watson, 2011). * ‘ Managing human capital is one of the most difficult tasks and has to be taken carefully because the relative relevant of human capital to the overall performance of organization cannot be overemphasized. The success or failure of any organization is ultimately predicted on. the quality of its workforce. It is obvious that human capital commitment, support and determination are the most veritable means of sustainable productivity. Therefore, the development of the employees in any organization must not be neglected. Any organization that is continuity should invest not only on technology but also in the development and training of its workforce. It is pertinent to acknowledge the fact that people are unique because they have diverse needs, attitude, ambition, le^el of kifowledge and skills as well as potentials for growth-and development. The most critical issue confronting any organization is how to get staff apt to work in a constructive sense, in a manner that will achieve desired results and thus give the worker a sense of fulfillment and satisfaction - hence, training and employee development. - , Investment on human capital development is a Wise one. Employees who have not received adequate training before .being assigned with responsibilities may lack the necessary confidence with which to carry out the jobs. Therefore, employee with goqd training will have the experience to perform the tasks that are required of him/her in an effective manner. The need for staff development has becordfe inevitable in a dynamic world of which Nigeria is part. The library environment, in which we find ourselves are dynamic and volatile With the sophistication of machineries and equipment, development of new methods and more efficient and effective ways of information service delivery and of new services. Every library needs to have well-trained and experienced library personnel to perform their duties. Therefore, training strategies in human capacity building remains the main priority for job performance in any organization such as library. Training and development play an important role in the effectiveness of organisations and to the experiences of people in work. University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JLIS) Vol. 2 No. I, March, 2 019 Pg5 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY Armstrong (2012) defined training as the systematic application of formal processes to impart knowledge and help workers to acquire requisite skills for them to perform their jobs satisfactorily. According to Olakunle and Ehi (2008), training is the systematic development of the knowledge, skill and attitude required by an individual employee to perform effectively on a given task or job.According to Obisi (2006), training is a process or procedure through which the skills, talent and knowledge of an employee is enhanced and increased. In other words, a successful training program me must contribute to the growth and development of the competencies and activation of employees at all levels Training affects attitude formation in a w ay that the employees' attitude is shaped with a view to getting their support and partnership in the enterprise. Training is defined as a short term process utilizing a systematic and organized procedure by which non-managerial personnel learn technical knowledge and skills for a definite purpose. W hen employees are trained, they get their skills improved and develop progression in their skills that will enhance their productivity and performance and subsequently complete their tasks on time. Armstrong (2006) defines training as the systematic development of the knowledge; skill and attitude required by arr individual to adequately perform a given task or job. Lwehabua tand Matovelo (2000) identified the library and information service managers as having a centre stage role for leading their subordinates in the process of bringing, an effective m anagem ent and good work output for their organizations. They stressed the importance of m anagers and their subordinates working together through managerial roles and sharing a strategy for an effective m anagem ent process. The study pointed out that self-management, understanding individual's behaviour assertiveness, delegation, em powerm ent and good relationship as some aspects that could help to harness an effective management process to improve and strengthen productivity. As pointed out by Aina (2004), it is generally known that the library and information profession borrows from a number of disciplines, such as sociology, psychology, com puter science, business management, mathematics, statistics, marketing, etc. Thus, anything that impacts on any of these disciplines would have a direct influence on library and inform ation science profession. Inform ation and communication technology (ICT) has radically transformed m ost of the services provided by a library. ICT is heavily utilized in the storage, processing and dissemination of information. University o f Ibadan - Jourhal ofLibraify and Information Science (UI-JLIS) Vol. 2 No. 1, March, 2019 Pg 6 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY Insaidoo (2001) ‘ aptly observes that human factor in the development of any organic society or institution is a very important element that ought to be addressed seriously to ensure optimum use and expression of individual talents and capabilities. It is a fact that^ society, institutions, or a nation could be endowed with logistics, natftral resources and other factors that lend support to life and development in the broader sense. However, without adequate human resources and a development capacity building scheme that is geared towards the ultimate goal of the society, or nation could be extremely difficult for such a nation to fully explore its resources and exploit them for socio­ economic, cultural and political development. There is no doubt about the fact that development is a product of education and education is a process through which people are formally and informally trained to acquire knowledge and skills. It is the realization of the enormous power of information that made libraries and information resource centers inevitably present in all the sectors of a nation's economy. METHODOLOGY A survey research design was adopted for this study which requires the selection of representative samples of a given population namely: University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Obafaemi Awolowo University, lie Ife, Osun state university, Osogbo, Lagos State University, Ojo, Bowen University Iwo and Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo. Descriptive statistics of frequency counts, percentage, mean and standard deviations were used in analyzing the research questions 1 to 4. The Statistical Package for Social Scientist (SPSS) version 2.0 was used to analyze the data. The Stratified sampling was used to select the six universities because the universities in south-west Nigeria were made up of federal, state and private universities and each of the group is needed in the sample. Total enumeration was therefore used to make up the sample size since the population of the library staff in the six selected universities was sizeable. Therefore, a total of two hundred and two 202 consisting of 111 librarians and 91 library officers constituted the sample size. University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JLIS) Vol:2No. 1, March, 2019 Pg 7 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY RESULTS AND DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS Table 4.1: Response rate S/N Libraries No o f copies No o f copies No o f copies % administered returned usable '1 ObafemiAwolowo 34 27 26 76.5 University, Ife 2 University 62 49 47 75.8 of Ibadan, Ibadan 3 Bowen 20 14 14 70.0 University, Iwo 4 Babcock 38 27 27 71.1 University, Ilishan-Remo 5 Lagos 26 18 17 65.4 State University, Ojo 6 Osun 22 16 16 72.7 State University TOTAL 202 151 147 72.8 Table 4.1 revealed that the highest return rate was recorded in Obafemi Awolowo University (76.5%) while the least response rate was ,recorded in Lagos State University (65.4%). Two hundred and two (202) copies of the questionnaire were administered on the respondents in all the six universities selected for the study. Of the 202 copies of the questionnaire distributed, 151 were returned while one hundred and forty seven were duly completed and found'usable for analysis. This represents 72.8%. This is presented in Table 4.1. qualifications, master's degree holders ranked highest with 76 (51.7%) while PhD holders were the least with only 4(2.7%) claiming to have Ph.D as their highest educational qualifications. The table further shows that of the job status of the two cadres selected for this study, librarian dominated with 78 (53.1%) while Library Officer 69 (46.9%) respondents respectively. University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JLIS) Vo/. 2 No. 1, March, 2019 Pg 8 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY Table 4.2: Level of capacity building in selected universities s/ Items I Monthly Quarterly Annually Occasionall Never N attend: y • Mean ST.D N % N % N % N % N % 1 Workshop 8 5.4 15 10. 43 29.3 73 49.7 8 5.4 2.679 1.2412 2 0 6 4 2 Computer 6 4.1 65 44. 46 31:3 22 15.0 8 5.4 3.061 .61069 based 2 /• 2 training 1 3 Job rotation 14 9.5 60 40. 51 34.7 .14 9.5 M 9.5 2.809 .90155 8 i» 5 1 ' 4 Conference - - 51 34. 65 44.2 15 10.2 16 10. 2.319 .93623 attendance 7 fr9 7 5 Coaching 70 47. 6 4.1 41 27.9 24 16.3 6 4.1 2.870 .97413 6 7 6 Classroom 45 30. 8 5.4 32 21.8 54 36.7 8 5.4 2.040 1.1755 courses 6 i 8 4 7 Self- 37 25. 37 25. 30 20.4 29 19.7 14 9.5 2.530 .89371 instruction 2 2 6 8 In service 6 4.1 12 8.2 37 25.2 84 57.1 8 5.4 2.224 1.3588 training 5 7 Weighted means =20.5366 Standard deviation = 8.09196 The result presented in the table revealed that itern 2 which stated that "I attend computer-based training" ranked highest in‘ terms of means score of 3.06(St. Dev.= 0.61069) as 71 (48.3%) of respondents claimed to attend computer based training either monthly or quarterly. This is followed by "coaching" with a mean score 2.8708 (St. Dev.=0.97413) while the least ranked item was item 6 "classroom courses" with a mean score of 2.0408 (St. Dev.=1.17554). This result could be analysed further by using a test norm where mean score of 1.0-13.3 indicates low level of capacity building, 13.4-26.6 indicates a moderate level of capacity building and 26.7- 40.0 indicates a high level of capacity University o f Ibadan -Journal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JLIS) VoL 2 No. 1, March, 2019 Pg9 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY huilding.The weighted mean as observed from table 4.2 is 20.5366which fall within the moderate level of capacity building. It istherefore concluded that the level of capacity building for library staff in universities in south-west Nigeria was moderate. Table 4.3: Types of capacity building strategies available in selected libraries S/N Item: SA A D SD Mean STD The following N % N % N % N % mechanisms are adopted in my library: 1 Workshop 47 32.0 35 23.8 33 22.4 32 21.8 2.4898 1.26798 2 Computer based training 49 33.3 47 32.0 42 28.6 9 6.1 2.6986 1.11441 3 Job rotation 23 15.6 49 33.3 38 25.9 37 25.2 2.8299 1.02952 4 Conference attendance 26 17.7 26 17.7 48 32.7 47 32.0 2.3605 1.11001 5 Coaching 23 15.6 44 29.9 23 15.6 57 38.8 2.5034 1.14302 6 Classroom courses 33 22.4 41 27.9 33 22.4 40 27.2 2.6122 1.03665 7 Self-instruction 30 20.4 47 32.0 36 24.5 34 23.1 2.5850 1.20980 8 In service training 42 28.6 57 38.8 45 30.6 3 2.0 2.3673 1.15321 Among the various forms of capacity building mechanisms indicated in table 4.3, job rotation had the highest mean score of 2.8299 (STD1.02952) which means that majority of the respondents agreed that job rotation is common to their respective libraries as a form of capacity building'strategy. The essence of this is that when job is rotated skills are acquired in every department and unit; thereby enhancing professionalism. Another mechanism given prominence by respondents as shown in the table is computer-based training with a mean score of 2.6986 (STD=1.11441). the implication of this is that it is the consensus of the respondents that computer-based training as a form of capacity building strategy for library staff is employed in selected universities in South-West, Nigeria. However, the least in terms of mean ranking is Conference attendance with mean score of 2.3605 (STD=1.11001) which means that majority of universities in south-west Nigeria do not sponsor their library staff for conference attendance. University of Ibadan - ]oumal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JLIS) Vol. 2 No. 1, March, 2019 PglO UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY Table 4.4: mean and standard deviation scores ort capacity building and job productivity S/N Items SA A D SD Mean • STD N % N % N % N % 1 Capacity 49 33.3 38 25.9 37 25.2 23 15.6 2*803 .86789 building helps me to be more creative 2 It helps me to 57 38.8 54 36.7 30 20.4 6 4.1 2.7211 .85032 complete assignment within schedule 3 It helps me to 49 33.3 37 25.2 38 25.9 23 15.6 2.7415 .75024 respond appropriately to the needs and feelings of different people in difficult situation 4 Capacity 48 32.7 57 38.8 33 22.4 9 6.1 3.0680 :9H57 building helps me to work with others 5 Capacity 44 29.9 36 24.5 37 25.2- 30 20.4 2.8095 1.11854 building helps me in ensuring that jobs within the areas of specific responsibility are completed in a timely manner 6 Capacity 65 44.2 41 27.9 27 18.4 14 9.5 3.1701 .95354 building equips library personnel skillfully and psychologically Overall mean 17.1905 5.4521 University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JLIS) Vol. 2 No. 1, March, 2019 P g l l UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY From Table 4.4a it could be observed that item 6 which states that "cap acity build ing equips library personnel sk illfu lly and psychologically" had the highest agreement score with 65 (44.2%) and 41 (27.9%) of respondents strongly agreed and agreed respectively with the mean score of 3.1701. this is followed by item 2 that capacity building helps to complete assignment within schedule. 57 (38.8%) of the respondents strongly agreed with this while 54 (36.7%) agreed. Table 4.6: Test norm showing the level o f capacity building of library staff Mean score ra nge Mean score range Mean score range 1.0 -8.0 8.1-16.0 16.1-24.0 Low Moderate High Mean score obtained = 17.19 Using the test norm to determine the extent to which capacity building affects job productivity of library staff, 1.0-8.0 indicates a low extent, 8.1-T6.0 moderate extent and 16.1 -24.0 indicates high extent. The overall mean score from the table is 17.1905 which fall within high range' (Table 4.4b ). This implies that the extent to which capacity building affects job productivity of library staff in selected universities in south- "west Nigeria is high. Table 4.5: level of job productivity of library staff in selected universities in South-West, Nigeria S/N Items Excellent Very Good Fair Poor Mean STD Good N % N % N % N % N % 1 Punctuality at work 60 40.8 51 34.7 14 9.5 14 9.5 8 5.4 4.2245 1.35887 2 Leadership Quality 46 31.3 65 44.2 22 15.0 8 5.4 6 4.1 3.7279 .96200 3* Quality pf work output 73 49.7 43 29.3 15 10.2 8 5.4 8 5.4 4.8776 1.13414 4 Dependability and honesty 54 36.7 32 21.8 45 30.6 8 5.4 8 5.4 3.5578 1.23382 5 Efficient and effective use of 57 38.8 39 26.5 48 32.7 3 2.0 - 3.1361 1.32747 resources 6 Communication skills 51 34.7 60 40.8 8 '5.4 14 9.5 14 9.5 3.0816 1.31123 7 Creative and Innovative 44 29.9 37 25.2 36 24.5 30 20.4 - - 3.4218 .98569 ability 8 Team building 30 20.4 44 29.9 37 25.2 15 10.2 15 10.2 2.5170 .88638 9 Interpersonal relationship 37 25.2 37 25.2 30 20.4 29 19.7 14 9.5 3.6667 .91661 10 Problem solving ability 49 33.3 30 20.4 38 25.9 23 15.6 7 4.8 3.4626 .89345 Overall mean = 35.6736 St.D= 11.00966 University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JLIS) Vol. 2 No. 1, March, 2019 Pg 12 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY To determine the level of job productivity .of library staff in universities in south-west Nigeria, a test norm was set such -that mean score of 0-13.3 indicates low level, 13.4-26.6 indicates moderate level and 26.7-40.0 indicates high level of job productivity. From table 4.5, the overall mean score of job productivity is 35.676 which fall within the high range. It could therefore be concluded that-the level of job productivity of library staff in selected universities in south west Nigeria is Kigh. Table 4.6: Test norm showing the level of capacity building of library staff Mean score range Mean score range Mean score range 0-13.3 13.4-26.6 26.740.0 Low Moderate High Mean score obtaned =35.676 Table 4.7: Population of the study S/N Libraries Librarians Library Total officers 1 ObafemiAwolowo University, Ife 24 10 34% 2 University of Ibadan, Ibadan 32 30 62 3 Bowen University, Iwo 12 8 20 4 Babcock University, Ilishan-Remo 14 24 38 6 Lagos State University, Ojo 19 7 26 7 Osun State University 10 12 22 Total 111 91 202 Source: Personal contacts and phone calls Discussion of findings The result of the research question one revealed that 71 (48.3%) of respondents claimed to attend computer based training either monthly or quarterly. This is followed by "coaching" with a mean score 2.8708 (STD=330.97413) while the least ranked item was item 6 "classroom courses" with a mean score of 2.0408 (STD=1.17554). This result further showed that the level of capacity building for library staff in selected University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JUS) Vol. 2 No. 1, March, 2019 Pg 13 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY universities in southwest Nigeria was moderate. This means that more needed to be done by libraries to enhance level of capacity building of library staff in universities. The finding on the various forms of capacity building mechanisms indicated job rotation had the highest mean score of 2.8299 (STD1.02952) which means that majority of the respondents agreed that job rotation is common to their respective libraries as a form of capacity building strategy. The essence of this is that when job is rotated, skills are acquired in every department and unit; thereby enhancing professionalism. Another mechanism given prominence by respondents as shown in the table is computer based training with a mean score of 2.6986 (STDf=l.11441). The implication of this is that it is the consensus of the respondents that computer based training as a form of capacity building strategy for library staff is employed in selected universities in South­ west, Nigeria. However, the least in terms of mean ranking is Conference attendance with mean score of 2.3605 (STD= 1.11001) which means that majority of universities in south-west Nigeria do not sponsor theii library staff for conferences. Furthermore, the result of research question three showed that that item 6 which states that "capacity equips library personnel skillfully and psychologically" had the highest agreement score with 65 (44.2%) and 41 (27.9%) of respondents strongly agreed and agreed respectively with the mean score of 3.1701. this is followed by item 2 that capacity building helps? to complete assignment within schedule. 57 (38.8%) of the Respondents strongly agreed with this while 54 (36.7%) agreed. The finding further revealed that the extent to which capacity building affects job productivity of library staff in selected universities in south-west Nigeria is, high. On the level of job productivity of library staff in selected universities in south-west, Nigeria, the result revealed that the overall mean score of job productivity is 35.676 which fall within the high range. It was therefore concluded that the level of job productivity of library staff in selected universities in south west Nigeria was high.Hence training of library personnel helps to increase productivity, increase employee morale, availability of skilled workforce, reduce supervision, bring personal growth, and many more. Conclusion This study examined capacity building and job productivity of library staff in selected universities in south-west Nigeria; it was revealed University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JLIS) VoL 2 No. 1, March, 2019 Pg 14 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY that capacity building is an inherent factor that contributes to the efficiency and effectiveness of productivity of library staff. Recommendations Arising from the findings of this study the following recommendations are considered necessary to have improved productivity among library staff. 1. Library personnel must be motivated to perform well in their jobs by giving them regular training programs that relate to their, individual work activities as this will translate in their job output not as individual workers but to the benefit of the library as well. 2. Library management should make training and development of its workers a priority to achieve higher productivity, motivate workers, reduce labor turnover, eliminate industrial unrest and reduce wastages. 3. All library personnel in charge of training and staff development should learn how best to sell training to the library management. This could be done by involving the boss in any form of training exposure or experience "acceptable" to him or her. In addition, some short courses overseas may be suitable as long as the exposure would enhance their effectiveness and performances. 4. The training need of each library staff should be identified and efforts geared towards meeting such training needs as this would lead to enhanced productivity and performance towards possible attainment of excellence. Such training and development should be a continuous process to be maintained by every library to enhance effective information service delivery. Library management should as a matter of necessity spend appreciable amount of money and time on training of its staff in order to increase their productivity in a competitive environment. University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and Information Sciettce (UI-JLIS) Vol. 2 No. 1, March, 2019 P g l5 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY REFERENCES Aina, L. 0 . 2004. Coping with the Challenges of Library and Information Services. Armstrong, M. 2006.A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 10th Edition, Kogan Page Publishing, London. Armstrong, M. 2012. Armstrong's Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. United Kingdom: Ashford Colour Press. Cole, G.A. 2002 Personnel and Human Resource Management.5th Edition. Continuum Publisher, London. Hakala, D. 2008. 16 Ways to Measure Employee Performance. Http:/ / www.hrworld.com. Retrieved on May 15,2019. Igbaekemen, G.O.2014. Capacity Building- A Tool for Increase Productivity in Nigeria Public Sector Organization. Global Journal of Human Resource Management, 2.3:45-58. Insaidoo, A.W.K. (2001)."Human Resource Development: The key to Sustainable Public Library Services in Ghana. Journal of Librarianship and Information in Africa. Vol. 1, no.l. Jans, N.andFfazer-Jans, J. (2004).Career Development, Job Rotation, and * Professional Performance.Armed Forces & Society - ARMED FORCES SOC. 30.255-277. Kreitner, R., Kinicki, A., Cole, N. (2007) Fundamentals of organizational behaviour. 2nd Canadian ed. McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited L-wehabura M J.F., Meftovelo,(2000) D S.Effective library management: issues for managers and subordinates,New Library World, Vol. 101 . Issue: 6, pp.263 -269, https://doi.org/10.1108/ 03074800010348822 Madukoma, E., Akpa, V.O. and Okafor, U.N. (2014) Effect of Training and Motivation on job Performance of Library Personnel of University ol Lagos, Lagos State, Nigeria. Open Access Library . Journal, 1: e804.http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1100804 Moahi, K, N. (2003). Computer Applications in Library and Information Science Research. In L. O. Aina (ed.) Research in Information Science:. An African Perspective. Ibadan: Stirling-Horden Publishers, pp. 158-184. ' r----- U „ t......... ........... ............ = = £ = .--------— -------------- — - ................................ ................- — = University of Ibadan - journal of Library and Information Science (UI-JLIS) Vol. 2 No. 1, March, 2 019 Pg 16 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY Muchinsky, P.M. (2003) Psychology Applied to Work. 7th Edition, Wadsworth, Belmont. NCEMA\ASCON (1999) "National Capacity Assessment Survey in Nigerian Public Sector". Interim Report (April). Noe, R. A. (2008). Employee training and development. New York: MacGraw-Hill, Inc. Obisi, C. (2011). Employee training and development in Nigerian organisaitons: Some observations and agenda for research. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 1 (9), 82-91. . \ J Olakunle, A.O.andEhi, P.0.(2008). Industrial sociology. Ibadan: penthouse Publications Rao, V.S.P 2010. Human resource management: Text and Cases. New Delhi: Anurag5ain Publishers. Porumbeanu, O. L, 2012. Creating a culture of learning and khoMedge sharing in Library and Information Services in Hou, H.T. (ed) New . Research on Knowledge Management Models and Methods in Tech, Rijeka. Saetang) J., Sulumnad, K., Thampitak, P. and Sungkaew, T. (2010) Factors Affecting Perceived Job Performance Among Staff: A Case Study of Ban Karuna Juvenile Vocational Training Centre for Boys. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 5,33-45. Shadare, O. A., and Hammed, T. A. (2009). Influence of work motivation, leadership effectiveness and time management on employees' performance in some selected industries in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 16,7-17 Sims, R. R. (2002) Managing Organisational Behaviour. Quorum Books. Westport,CT. Https://w ww .questia.com /read/101283273/ managing-organizational-behavior. Viswesvaran, C. and Ones, D. S. 2000. Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 216-226/ Watson, W. T. 2011.Perspectives:The power of three. Takirtg engagement to new heights www.towerswatson.com/DownloadMedia. Aspx?media... University o f Ibadan - Journal o f Library and Information Science (UI-JLIS) Vol. 2 No. 1, March, 2019 Pg 17 UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN LIBRARY