Scholarly works in Psychiatry

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Effect of collaborative care between traditional and faith healers and primary health-care workers on psychosis outcomes in Nigeria and Ghana (COSIMPO): a cluster randomised controlled trial
(Elsevier Ltd, 2020) Gureje, O.; Appiah-Poku, J.; Bello, T.; Kola, L.; Araya, R.; Chisholm, D.; Esan, O.B.; Harris, B.; Makanjuola, V.; Othieno, C.; Price, L.
Background: Traditional and faith healers (TFH) provide care to a large number of people with psychosis in many sub Saharan African countries but they practise outside the formal mental health system. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a collaborative shared care model for psychosis delivered by TFH and primary health-care providers (PHCW). Methods: In this cluster-randomised trial in Kumasi, Ghana and Ibadan, Nigeria, we randomly allocated clusters (a primary care clinic and neighbouring TFH facilities) 1:1, stratified by size and country, to an intervention group or enhanced care as usual. The intervention included a manualised collaborative shared care delivered by trained TFH and PHCW. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) newly admitted to TFH facilities with active psychotic symptoms (positive and negative syndrome scale [PANSS] score ≥60). The primary outcome, by masked assessments at 6 months, was the difference in psychotic symptom improvement as measured with the PANSS in patients in follow-up at 3 and 6 months. Patients exposure to harmful treatment practices, such as shackling, were also assessed at 3 and 6 months. Care costs were assessed at baseline, 3-month and 6-month follow-up, and for the entire 6 months of follow-up. This trial was registered with the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trial registry, NCT02895269. Findings: Between Sept 1, 2016, and May 3, 2017, 51 clusters were randomly allocated (26 intervention, 25 control) with 307 patients enrolled (166 [54%] in the intervention group and 141 [46%] in the control group). 190 (62%) of participants were men. Baseline mean PANSS score was 107∙3 (SD 17∙5) for the intervention group and 108∙9 (18∙3) for the control group. 286 (93%) completed the 6-month follow-up at which the mean total PANSS score for intervention group was 53∙4 (19∙9) compared with 67∙6 (23∙3) for the control group (adjusted mean difference –15∙01 (95% CI –21∙17 to –8∙84; 0·0001). Harmful practices decreased from 94 (57%) of 166 patients at baseline to 13 (9%) of 152 at 6 months in the intervention group (–0∙48 [–0∙60 to –0∙37] (p<0.001) and from 59 (42%) of 141 patients to 13 (10%) of 134 in the control group (–0·33 [–0∙45 to –0∙21] (p<0.001) with no significant difference between the two groups. Greater reductions in overall care costs were seen in the intervention group than in the control group. At the 6-month assessment, greater reductions in total health service and time costs were seen in the intervention group; however, cumulative costs over this period were higher (US $627 per patient vs $526 in the control group). Five patients in the intervention group had mild extrapyramidal side effects. Interpretation: A collaborative shared care delivered by TFH and conventional health-care providers for people with psychosis was effective and cost-effective. The model of care offers the prospect of scaling up improved care to this vulnerable population in settings with low resources
Sleep quality and cognitive impairments in remitted patients with schizophrenia in Nigeria.
(Elsevier, 2021) Esan, O.B.; Ephraim-Oluwanuga, O. T.
Background. – Despite the ubiquity of sleep disturbance in schizophrenia, it has generally been overlooked as a potential contributor to cognitive impairments. The main aim of this study was to find out if impaired sleep quality contributes to cognitive impairments in patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia who are in remission. Methods. – The study was conducted at the University College Hospital, Ibadan and State Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP) were applied in this cross-sectional study, to all consecutive and consenting remitted outpatients with schizophrenia (N = 130). Other instruments such as Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), sociodemographic and clinical measures were also applied. Results. – There were 130 participants made up of 69 females (53.1%) and 61 males(46.9%). The mean age of the participants was 38.5 ± 9.1 years. The prevalence of poor sleep quality in remitted patients with schizophrenia was 56.9%. Sleep quality was significantly negatively correlated with Verbal Learning Test-Immediate (VLT-I) (r(128) = -.18, P = .044) and Verbal Learning Test-Delayed (VLT-D) (r(128) = -.18, P = .037). The variables that independently predicted cognitive functioning were the VLT-I, odds ratio (OR) 0.66; 95% confidence interval ((CI) 0.49-0.88) and education (OR) 0.61;(CI) 0.40- 0.92). Conclusion. – Poor subjective sleep quality measured by the PSQI is linked to cognitive impairment in remitted patients with schizophrenia. We suggest that sleep quality in remitted patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia should receive better attention by physicians.
Staging of schizophrenia with the use of PANSS: an international multi-center study
(Oxford University Press, 2021) Fountoulakis, K.N.; Dragioti, E.; Theofilidis, A.T.; Wikilund, T.; Atmatzidis, X.; Nimatudis, I; Thys, E.; Wampers, M.; Hranov, L.; Hristova, T.; Aptalidis, D.; Milev, R.; Iftene, F.; Esan, O.B.; Oladele, O.B.; Osunbote, C.
Introduction: A specific clinically relevant staging model for schizophrenia has not yet been developed. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the factor structure of the PANSS and develop such a staging method. Methods: Twenty-nine centers from 25 countries contributed 2358 patients aged 37.21 ± 11.87 years with schizophrenia. Analysis of covariance, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Discriminant Function Analysis, and inspection of resultant plots were performed. Results: Exploratory Factor Analysis returned 5 factors explaining 59% of the variance (positive, negative, excitement/hostility, depression/anxiety, and neurocognition). The staging model included 4 main stages with substages that were predominantly characterized by a single domain of symptoms (stage 1: positive; stages 2a and 2b: excitement/hostility; stage 3a and 3b: depression/anxiety; stage 4a and 4b: neurocognition). There were no differences between sexes. The Discriminant Function Analysis developed an algorithm that correctly classified >85% of patients. Discussion: This study elaborates a 5-factor solution and a clinical staging method for patients with schizophrenia. It is the largest study to address these issues among patients who are more likely to remain affiliated with mental health services for prolonged periods of time.

Scholarly works in Psychiatry

Browse

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results