scholarly works
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://repository.ui.edu.ng/handle/123456789/477
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Numerical and experimental investigation on performance of convex-cut baffles in shell-and tube heat exchanger(2020) Petinrin, M. O.; Dare, A. A.In this study, comparative performance of single-segmental baffle and a newly developed baffle –convex-cut in shell-and-tube heat exchanger were both numerically and experimentally investigated. For the numerical analysis, three working fluids (engine oil, water and air) were successively utilised on the shell-side of heat exchangers with 30, 35, 40 and 45% convex-cut (CeC_STHE) and 25% segmental (SS_STHE) baffles, and the resulting models were solved in COMSOL Multiphysics. Experiments were carried out on 30% CeC_STHE and SS_STHE exclusively running on water. The data obtained were used to determine the weighted shell-side heat transfer coefficient and weighted performance factor of each heat exchanger. Hence, the results for all the ranges of Reynolds number indicate that the shell-side heat transfer coefficients of all the CeC_STHEs are lower than that of SS_STHE except for the 30% CeC_STHE. However, the SS_STHE showed greater pressure drop than the CeC_STHEs. The choice of working fluid had more influenced on the weighted shell-side heat transfer coefficient CeC_STHE. Moreover, the weighted performance factors of the CeC_STHEs indicated positive values. Thus, 30% CeC_STHE demonstrated a better performance while the 45% had the lowest performance.Item Numerical investigation of the concave-cut baffles effect in shell-and-tube heat exchanger(2019) Petinrin, M. O.; Dare, A. A.In this paper, the performance of shell-and-tube heat exchangers with single-segmental baffle and varying configurations of concave-cut baffles (10, 15 and 20 %) was investigated. The study was carried out for a heat exchanger having either engine oil, water and air as shell-side fluid. For each configuration of the baffles, the results of both the k-ε and RNG k-ε turbulent models were in very close agreement. The heat exchangers with concavecut baffles had higher pressure drops and lower performance factors than that of single-segmental baffle at the same range of mass flow rates for all fluid cases. Also, the concave-cut baffle heat exchangers had lower shell-side heat transfer coefficients at the same pressure drop against that of single-segmental baffles. Thus, the use of concave-cut baffles did not exhibit desirable performance in heat exchanger as compared with the segmental baffles.